PJ: check his profile out la, or Jiterator on Youtube. lol. wonder how he came up with that.
Andy: i was looking at IKEA stuff too. heard alot about how it doesn’t last. but i feel it’s the people not taking care or misusing it. statistics for tests do speak. and some stuff i really like!~ anyway, COMD must be worried about our Frame. lol.
Xenia: i shall look forward to my 10th cube. (sometimes, i duno i got so many for what. -.-) study study study!
======================================
I guess a hallmark of soldiering is Spartan Living. it means having a very basic life, plain Utilitarian.
“i put on my clothes because i need to be warm.”
OR
“i eat because i need the energy to do stuff.”
a basic syntax would be, “i need THIS because i need to DO THAT.”
is was never a place where… “i put on this top because i want to look slimmer.”
OR
“i eat chocolate because i so crave it’s taste!”
Spartans have no emotion. Soldiers are supposed to have no emotion. hmm, wrong. Soldiers should be acting on logic and not let their emotions sway their decisions and actions. i spent 3 weeks plus in a foreign land and i looked around. observing the actions of people. some evaluate with logic. some with emotion. few act with logic. many suppress their emotions in their actions. some act with emotion. i felt that it was very hard to decide on a certain standard of a person’s mentality. or more accurately, to determine whether a person has good evaluation skills.
given a same set of variables, how would you consider a situation, in order to determine the SALIENT point? a bigger problem is often, what exactly would be THE salient point?
differing perspectives have been creating different evaluations, with each evalutation exhibiting a different degree of accuracy to meet the situation. and since it’s about people, i guess any organization would need to attract the right people first. that would be the problem.
many organizations take up 2 methods.
1. get the RIGHT people through stringent layers elimination.
2. get
WILLING people by offering remunerations and benefits and NURTURE them to the RIGHT QUALITY.
which one seems right? which one answers to the problem? which one is a more CORRECT methodology?
to ensure the Quality while you have few in Quantity or to achieve Quantity and produce Quality?
i have my own perspective (which draws much fire.) ponder on what benefits the situation, while i put my thoughts to words.
Browse Timeline
Comments ( 3 )
haha, Sir, monday i going to see him,so maybe can frame up nice nice for him.DY and i going to see him regarding a parents brochure and commissioning for the cadets. I stayed back until 7pm to do it la. but DY very nice, sent me go cell group. haha. and… He told me something major happened to one of the cadets in Brunei. everyone know about it already. Delta wing comm talking to DY about it today. i hope that fella not from platoon 2!
Andy added these pithy words on
May 30 08 at
11:57 pm
CG MISSES U!
quick quick. roll back to sg k.
KristK added these pithy words on
May 31 08 at
12:48 am
haha i love this entry. it really sets me thinking =). so if you were the manager of a organisation. will u chose method 1 or 2.
haha actually i seen more cubes ard.. handphone strap 2×2 de. lol.. from action city yups.. collect for the fun of it.. =). like how u collect ur last collection =D
Xenia added these pithy words on
May 31 08 at
1:25 am
Add a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
